Since the Alabama Constitution alleges that life begins at conception, then are the laws that the Alabama Legislature passed to protect IVF automatically unconstitutional? Because under their Constitution the act of discarding embryos that are not viable for implantation in a uterus would be regarded as manslaughter. Or murder. So do you see this entire shit situation headed to the US Supreme Court? Is the only outcome for this be for the conservative dickheads on the Court to decide if life begins at conception? Is there any other possible path out of this shit?
It seems obvious that the President of the United States was not meant to have the kind of unquestionable “divine” authority of a 18th century monarch. How is it possible that anyone on the Supreme Court, originalist or not, could consider saying that the president has absolute immunity? It boggles my mind.
Since the Alabama Constitution alleges that life begins at conception, then are the laws that the Alabama Legislature passed to protect IVF automatically unconstitutional? Because under their Constitution the act of discarding embryos that are not viable for implantation in a uterus would be regarded as manslaughter. Or murder. So do you see this entire shit situation headed to the US Supreme Court? Is the only outcome for this be for the conservative dickheads on the Court to decide if life begins at conception? Is there any other possible path out of this shit?
It seems obvious that the President of the United States was not meant to have the kind of unquestionable “divine” authority of a 18th century monarch. How is it possible that anyone on the Supreme Court, originalist or not, could consider saying that the president has absolute immunity? It boggles my mind.