Who supposedly engraved the Ten Commandments? Wasn’t he a Hebrew? What was his religion? How many years have us WASP individuals been against that group?
Everyone should congratulate George Conway and his fellow Federalist Society members who worked for decades to construct a Supreme Court which would gleefully violate just about every word in the US Constitution with the goal of killing US democracy and establish a Christo-fascist state.
If this law would actually go into affect, and it turns out that all the displays are in fact donated by Protestant churches, would that not then demonstrate conclusively that this violates the establishment clause?
I mean, before the Roberts court, you wouldn't have even needed to go that far. Now? Who the hell knows. The closest thing to an establishment clause test that they have is (say it with me) "history and tradition," which means, "who can cherry-pick a thing that lets them do the thing they want to do?"
What's weird is that a supermajority of the Supreme Court is Catholic.
Oh, I had to cut like a 1,000-word rabbit trail about how stunningly dishonest the Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. decision is, even for this SCOTUS.
True story: in my first draft, I mistakenly attributed the opinion to Alito, rather than Gorsuch (who actually wrote it), because the heuristic of "obviously lying about the facts means Alito" is so reliable.
Who supposedly engraved the Ten Commandments? Wasn’t he a Hebrew? What was his religion? How many years have us WASP individuals been against that group?
Free breakfast and lunch for every student? Puhhleeeze! Why when you get the Ten Commandments?
Everyone should congratulate George Conway and his fellow Federalist Society members who worked for decades to construct a Supreme Court which would gleefully violate just about every word in the US Constitution with the goal of killing US democracy and establish a Christo-fascist state.
Yeah, I hope all those Never Trumpers and Lincoln Project GOPers are having come-to-Jesus “What have I done?” moments.
Lie, cheat, steal. It’s the “Christian” thing to do.
If this law would actually go into affect, and it turns out that all the displays are in fact donated by Protestant churches, would that not then demonstrate conclusively that this violates the establishment clause?
I mean, before the Roberts court, you wouldn't have even needed to go that far. Now? Who the hell knows. The closest thing to an establishment clause test that they have is (say it with me) "history and tradition," which means, "who can cherry-pick a thing that lets them do the thing they want to do?"
What's weird is that a supermajority of the Supreme Court is Catholic.
Conservative Opus Dei Catholics, who have a long history of allying themselves with conservative Evangelicals.
I would give you an extra upvote for Mel Brooks if I could.
Liz's image game is STRONG, y'all
Theocrats have no compunction about lying to get what they want.
Oh, I had to cut like a 1,000-word rabbit trail about how stunningly dishonest the Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dist. decision is, even for this SCOTUS.
True story: in my first draft, I mistakenly attributed the opinion to Alito, rather than Gorsuch (who actually wrote it), because the heuristic of "obviously lying about the facts means Alito" is so reliable.